<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Motley Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1</id>
   <updated>2008-08-18T22:47:38Z</updated>
   <subtitle>For the Greater Good of Every Individual

The Blog of Douglas Tooley</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.35</generator>

<entry>
   <title>The Zen of the Water Stick - Whitewater Slalom at Beijing</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/the_zen_of_the_water_stick_whi.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.147</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T20:53:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T22:47:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Saturday Morning I stopped by Tacoma&apos;s Dragon Boat Festival, the large Asian Canoes somewhat similar to a Hawaiian Outrigger, also popular here in the Pacific NW. I believe the crowd was largely Cambodian, the kids looked like they were having...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Out Through the In Door" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[Saturday Morning I stopped by Tacoma's Dragon Boat Festival, the large Asian Canoes somewhat similar to a Hawaiian Outrigger, also popular here in the Pacific NW.  I believe the crowd was largely Cambodian, the kids looked like they were having a lot of fun.  Mayor Baarsma spoke briefly to a sparse crowd.  In the Baarsma style he gave a quick speech, and he seemed a bit uncomfortable in front of the audience.

Curiously, I mentioned my Baarsma impressions to two other people I ran into that same day, both of whom had Baarsma Dragon Boat stories. Hmmm...

More importantly though in Beijing Whitewater Canoe Slalom was being contested at the 2008 Olympics.

This is my sport, and unlike the endurance of flatwater long distance boating Whitewater Slalom is a sprint, and very much an art.  The amount of power in a river is incredible and your blade is the way you interact with that energy, maintaining as much control as possible.

It has struck me that whitewater sport is something very amenable to the philosophies of various martial arts.  It was an idea of mine to get to China this year and do a little bit of primary source research on the subject while attending this event.  Alas, that was not be, perhaps that is an opportunity that is still open to me.

A couple of lessons from this sport towards that same end:

   1.  Always know where you are going on the move after your next one

   2,   No matter what you do, you are going to be going downstream.  

Deal with it! 

My particular class was Single Decked Canoe - an estoteric specialty.  I was good, but certainly not of international medal caliber.  My biggest distinction was being the first team member from the West Coast, ever.  Personally though my training marked the transition from being the unathletic geek to being pretty buff.  After all, controlling your own life is the most important thing, isn't it?

Here's the Video of the top 3 finishers in this same class, from NBC:

<a href="http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/player.html?assetid=0811_sd_csm_rv_ce070&channelcode=sportca">Beijing Whitewater C-1 Video
(approx. 15 minutes)</a>

The American in this class was a newcomer, Benn Fraker, from Georgia, who placed sixth.  Heather Corrie of America placed 8th in the women's kayak class, while the male kayaker, Scott Parsons, did not make the final.


]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Eating Raoul</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/eating_raoul.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.146</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T20:33:36Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T20:44:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Eating Raoul Directed by Paul Bartel Starring Paul Bartel Written by Paul Bartel, with Richard Blackburn 1982 Imagine the Wine aficionado couple from the recent movie &apos;Sideways&apos; (Paul Giamatti and Virginia Madsen) ten years later and you have the start...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Delusional, or Love?" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="For Fun or Love..." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>Eating Raoul</strong></u>

<em>Directed by Paul Bartel

Starring Paul Bartel

Written by Paul Bartel, with Richard Blackburn</em>

<strong>1982</strong>

Imagine the Wine aficionado couple from the recent movie 'Sideways' (Paul Giamatti and Virginia Madsen) ten years later and you have the start of this movie.

Then put on your bell bottoms and other 'inspired' items from the 1970's, light up some Thai Stick and get ready to swing baby!  Or, if you prefer, a glass of Pinot Noir or a Fume Blanc!

FWIW Giamatti and Madsen could probably put together a pretty mean Country Restaraunt, but I'd hope they treated the help better than Bartel and his screen wife.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Measuring State AG McKenna  -  and  Pierce County Prosecutor Gerald Horne</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/measuring_mckenna_pierce_count.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.145</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-18T19:44:00Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-18T20:26:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I&apos;m a fan of current Washington State Attorney General McKenna. I saw him work in detail on the Sound Transit Board in the tough days leading up to the passage of the first Bond Issue. Many times he was the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Crusing Cascadia - NW Regional" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Everybody&apos;s Business - Public Corporate and Government - as appropriate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Law and Consequence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      I&apos;m a fan of current Washington State Attorney General McKenna. I saw him work in detail on the Sound Transit Board in the tough days leading up to the passage of the first Bond Issue.  Many times he was the sole voice of dissent, though frequently he worked with his fellow King County Councilmember, the relatively independent Maggi Fimia of Shoreline.  Although he himself was opposed to the project he was always constructive and his involvement led to a strong start for that agency - and a strong bus dominated plan of service for his own district area, the Eastside of King County.

Unfortunately the Sound Transit Board lost its leadership continuity in the days after passage.  My opinion is that the turnover was a powerplay by the powers that be (operating through the Greater Seattle Chamber of Comerce).  There was also  a well managed financial &apos;scandal&apos; that pretty much finished the job not too much later..

I&apos;m voting for McKenna this time around, and I think he&apos;ll win.  However I am concerned as to whether he&apos;s keeping his own &apos;continuity of leadership&apos; as he matures in office.  I&apos;m of the opinion the barrel is rotten and we all know what all to often happens to good folks in such a situation.

Top on the bad apple level, and more senior to McKenna, would be the former AG, Christine Gregoire, and, on the Republican side King County Prosecutor (Seattle and immediate suburbs) Satterberg.  FWIW, these two are the start of the Government &apos;Blame Game&apos; cited effectively by current GOP gubernatorial candidate Dino Rossi.
      <![CDATA[Gregoire and Satterberg have a relationship that they characterize as 'bi-partisan' - unfortunately what this means in practice is that it is the interests of the legal profession that get advanced, irregardless of what either party desires - and independents - well independents - the ones that elected McKenna in this Democratic state - they are the profession's 21'st century niggers.

Gregoire and Satterberg are widely respected in the profession for this, but this does not really mean a thing as to how they serve the <em>public</em> interest.  I think one of the best ways to see this effect is in how they supervise their own employees, including perhaps most notably, the female ones.

I won't go into details here, but I think it clear that both Gregoire and Satterberg place the interests of their employees over that of the 'public' - leading to an overall decay in the quality of the profession and our government.  (FWIW Gregoire extends these same priviliges to State Bureaucrats while Satterberg, et al have a much closer power circle with undercuts the authority of County professionals.)

I think this is clearly seen in the Hague DUI muffing which led to an abusive drug addict being elected to an office for which she should have been restrained from.  

The recent Pierce County Prosecutor (Gerald Horne) case involving a disgruntled disciplined female employee  highlights some of the risks an elected Prosecutor case - why hold a subordinate accountable if it runs the risk of damaging your reputation?  I can't speak to the details of this case, however, do ask yourself - would you or I have access to the same level of justice if we were terminated - rightly or wrongly?  NO  Would most of us even have access to the courts with representation - NO.

That in itself shows the bias the profession has towards itself over the public.

Although Brian Sonntag, State Auditor, is of the same quality cloth as McKenna his influence probably does not match that of Gregoire and Satterberg.  I fear that McKenna's next term will mark the turning point as a useful public servant.

I hope I am wrong.

As to Gerald Horne, I know that personally a King County jury decision means very little to me - certainly the vast majority of the legal profession practicing in Downtown Seattle (most living on the Eastside).   We shall see what the other voters of Pierce County think as well.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Clinton v. Bush - at Yale</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/clinton_v_bush_at_yale.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.144</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-14T13:19:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-14T14:18:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Some speculation here on the &apos;profiles&apos; of Bush and Clinton during there College years - for a bit of mostly non-partisan educational &apos;fun&apos;. Although both got their undergraduate degrees in 1968, Clinton did not arrive till 1970 for his Law...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="For Fun or Love..." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      Some speculation here on the &apos;profiles&apos; of Bush and Clinton during there College years - for a bit of mostly non-partisan educational &apos;fun&apos;.

Although both got their undergraduate degrees in 1968, Clinton did not arrive till 1970 for his Law Degree - after his Rhodes Scholarship.  Curiously, the Washington Post biography of George W. cites 1964 as a transitional political year at that institution.

I&apos;ve done a quick google review of both men&apos;s record at Yale, but before I get to the facts let&apos;s start with some assumptions I had before starting to write this piece.
      <![CDATA[Bush and Yale would be quite the contrast in Students.  

Although both were from outside the east coast social hierarchy Bush clearly had a high position in that society.

Clinton, though not necessarily poor, was definitely the hick from Arkansas who earned his way there - and had definitely some poor years in his life, as well as an abusive alcholic step-father as the price of entry to the business owner middle class. 

I'd bet that George was much more of a party boy than Clinton.  And although I do believe Clinton became the better leader I'm also of the opinion that Bush was the better 'lover' - at College and as Husband - probably due a solid upbringing which gave him something to fall back upon through a not unusual moral path through college. 

Okay, now for some facts. Hillary was a year ahead of Bill, choosing the young, bright upstart for herself.  Not much else popped up in my quick search - presumably by the time the Rhodes Scholar arrived at Yale he knew he had a career ahead of him and was both professionally and legally prudent.  I didn't look at his Georgetown years, but, FWIW, I'd bet he worked his ass off.

There is quite a bit more about George W. - the alleged recipient of the iconic Ivy league 'gentleman's C' - all the more important at that time in order to keep sonny out of Vietnam. Bush arrived in the year of his Skull and Bones father's unsuccessful Senate campaign against a LBJ ticket rider (1964).  His fraternity was the Jock Party group and he was elected as president of the that group during his Senior year - perhaps his last positive association with the greater campus community.  

The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/bush072799.htm">Washington Post Biography</a> asserts that his Senior year was a year of political transition at Yale, so one can imagine the privileged frat boy being quite the symbol of politically correct derision - and probably with justifiable cause.  One can channel that through partisan coverage of those years, <a href="http://www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2006/11/2/2468355.html">worth reading</a>.

The Post also asserts that Bush's Skull and Bones membership was a 'legacy' membership, not one earned as with the other 14 members.  Also noted was that applicants were required to disclose their sexual history.  Not a whif of that though is available.

 There is a lesson here - and it's not which is the better man.  Clinton the hard working student who bust his butt to make it would later succumb to some of the moral failings that Bush got over between the ages of 18-22.  Bush, the well raised, but spoiled, party boy would actually turn out to be the better Husband (and Father???), if not a very good leader.

FWIW, a person in Clinton's sexual 'profile' would be at high risk of having his later explorations becoming a permanent part of his character.  Clinton though, an exceptional individual, might have a shot at 'growing' out of it.  

In contrast, Dick Cheney, a five time DUI recipient, is a good example of the type of young man who never did grow out of it at all.

And Gore, well, Al - maybe it's time for YOU to get your groove on... in your own way, and in public.  Perhaps Barack can help with that???

And McCain, well we are still waiting to see who you choose...:-)]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Rules of Attraction</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/rules_of_attraction.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.143</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-12T00:12:22Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-12T00:50:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Rules of Attraction By Bret Easton Ellis 1987 I was prompted to read this book by my recent review of the classic Christian Bale movie written originally by Ellis, &apos;American Psycho&apos;. This book, his first, was also turned into a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>Rules of Attraction</strong></u>

<em>By Bret Easton Ellis</em>

<strong>1987</strong>

I was prompted to read this book by my recent review of the classic Christian Bale movie written originally by Ellis, 'American Psycho'.

This book, his first, was also turned into a movie, by the same name.  I've seen it - my memory of it is positive, but no more distinct than that it reminded me of my first alma mater, Hampshire College.  'Rules of Attraction' as a book however has created quite a distinct memory. Excuse me while I indulge myself by recanting same - and restating some of his same 'rules' for your own pleasure and evolving judgement.

Ellis is a moralist wielding sexuality like a Shao Lin monk or Zen master wields a sword.

]]>
      <![CDATA[He is a graduate of Bennington College in New Hampshire, which explains why the book reminded me so much of Hampshire College - on the East Coast they are very much siblings in the realm of the NE Liberal Establishment.

The academic year for the book was 1985/86 - presumably Ellis's senior year.  I was in exactly that same class, and though I've never visited Bennington, I was actually in a bit of a triangle myself with a Bennington student I never met, probably the class after Ellis, if I recall correctly.

Though this book is a tale of debauchery it is also a tale of learning the lessons from such experiences - which some people do, and some people don't.  I'd spent a year working and travelling before going to school and I think I'd learned many of those lessons about sex and drugs prior to starting.

Although I'd become much more of an educated occassional user by that time I was however more <em>practiced</em> with drugs than with sex (however also finished with bi-explorations), not that this should really matter.

Reading this book at my current age was a bit of an epiphany - besides reliving past experiences it also gave me the opportunity to see just how 'older' folks would have perceived us at that time.

Unfortunately the administrators at Hampshire didn't know how to deal with it either - and instead used the perception of problems to go after folks where none existed - instead burdening  their own ape shit control freak upon a still 'inexperienced' crowd.

I don't think this country has really yet learned how to take apply the lessons of the sexual revolution of the 60's and 70's.  Let's hope that folks that did, like Bret Easton Ellis, get their chance to put those lessons to work.

Oh, and for the record, the story of my friends during that same academic year (absent moi) probably beats Bennington's - and widely known enough to have been a factor in his getting published.  I've got a few Hampshire stories in my biography, starting with that one, <a href="http://www.motleytools.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=Hampshire+College">here</a>.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Being There</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/being_there.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.142</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-10T00:42:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-10T01:07:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Being There Directed by Hal Ashby Book and Screenplay by Jerry Kozinski Starring Peter Sellers with Shirley McLaine and Richard Dysart 1979 This movie was the capstone of a career of shere comedic genius. Sellers is perhaps best known as...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>Being There</strong></u>

<em>Directed by Hal Ashby

Book and Screenplay by Jerry Kozinski

Starring Peter Sellers

with Shirley McLaine and Richard Dysart</em>

<strong>1979</strong>

This movie was the capstone of a career of shere comedic genius.  Sellers is perhaps best known as the bumbling French Inspector Clouseau in the Pink Panther series, starting in 1963.  1964's 'Dr Strangelove' (directed by Stanley Kubrick) may well exceed this movie in the eyes of history, but both are clearly part of it.

'Being There' is a critique of TV driven culture and politics and in it's time it was biting.  In this age of emerging internet media influence the look back makes this a different movie than at the time of it's release.  I recently watched it again, and enjoyed it immensely, all the more so for this being an election year.

If you aren't familiar with the plot it concerns a reclusive gardner forced into a world he only knows from TV, after his lifelong employer dies.  He actually does pretty good, much to the chagrin of the black maid who took care of him previously.

In reviewing Sellers Filmography for this piece I noticed a 1967 James Bond Spoof he did of "Casino Royale'.  The cast includes Ursula Andress as the Bond Girl, David Niven, Orson Welles, Woody Allen, John Huston, Deborah Kerr and William Holden.  I'm gonna watch this one soon, sorry Mr. Meyers.


]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Belle Epoque</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/belle_epoque.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.141</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-10T00:00:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-10T00:33:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Belle Epoque (The Age of Beauty) Starring Penelope Cruz 1992 This 1992 romantic comedy was set during the Spanish civil war - a favorite period for Guillermo Del Toro whom I&apos;ve also recently covered. (This period also holds my attention...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>Belle Epoque</strong></u>
<strong>(The Age of Beauty)</strong>

<em>Starring Penelope Cruz</em>

<strong>1992</strong>

This 1992 romantic comedy was set during the Spanish civil war - a favorite period for Guillermo Del Toro whom I've also recently covered.  (This period also holds my attention - arguably the most significant chapter of the 20th Century.)

This was Cruz's first leading role, the youngest of four sisters 'hosting' the only man in town, a deserter from the Spanish Army.  There is no nudity in the movie, but nonetheless it is very, very sexy, as well as funny.

If you are not familiar with the Spanish Civil War it immediately preceded WW2 ending in the victory of the military dictator Franco in 1939 - backed by the Axis and the Catholic Church.  The opposition, the 'Republicans' were largely communist, including some 30,000 American Union sympathesizers who volunteered in the 'Abraham Lincoln Brigade'.  Although often disparaged the so-called anarchist faction of the Republican side did stand up to the communist influences, though perhaps this is what caused their defeat.

BTW, the film adaptation of the Hemmingway Book regarding this war, 'For Whom the Bell Tolls', is also pretty good.  Although Ingrid Bergman is not particularly convincing as a spanish peasant girl she is perhaps at her absolute best.  This leaves me in a dilemna - which is the more romantically beautiful - Bergman or Cruz.  Cruz or Bergman.  Please, excuse me while I think on that one a bit..



]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>King County Superior Court Candidates - Suzanne Parisien Email Exchange</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/superior_court_candidates_suza.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.140</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-09T23:44:32Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-10T00:00:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A frequent complaint of anyone who takes their responsibility as a citizen seriously is the lack of decent information on judicial races. Getting a good picture of a Judge is difficult. Unless one is a regular observer of the court...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Around the Lake - North King County" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Fool For A Client" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Law and Consequence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      A frequent complaint of anyone who takes their responsibility as a citizen seriously is the lack of decent information on judicial races.  Getting a good picture of a Judge is difficult.  Unless one is a regular observer of the court - a practicing lawyer, an intelligent court clerk, or above average police officer.  One area where we definitely could do better is holding these individuals responsible for the consequences of their actions when the mess up - if it rise to that level, even just once.  Even more important of course is removing such a dangerous individual from the practice BEFORE they ever get to consideration for a judicial seat.

I&apos;ve got no smoking gun on Parisiene - however I do have a bit of information, enough to cause me not to vote for her, absent evidence to the contrary, and perhaps of some use to you.

Parisien is a 90k a year Assistant Attorney General since 1997, hired by Christine Gregoire.  

My direct knowledge of her is through an email exchange - a response to an email to Ron Sims about the trickiness of dealing with abuse issues - whether they be sexual, racial, or anything.  I don&apos;t think that Ms. Parisiene read my email closely enough to realize that I wasn&apos;t disagreeing with his assessment of Gregoire - and as such perhaps not as pro-Gregoire as Ms. Parisien thought.  This was in the spring of the 2004 Gubernatorial year when Sims was contesting for the old style democratic nomination - I haven&apos;t checked but I would assume Ms. Parisien did go through the appropriate hoops in order to volunteer for her boss&apos;s campaign.
.  
I&apos;ve done a quick google on Parisien - perhaps the best info out there are the various candidate interviews done by political organizations including partisan legislative district bodies.  She graduated from SU and went to Law School back east, practicing there for a time, returning here in 1997 for an AG position.  She moved to Mercer Island 6 years ago.  She&apos;s done a lot of domestic violence work, including with King County, and this is what concerns me.

For a supposed expert on the subject of abuse her answer strikes me as curiously lacking.   Some State Departmental employess, including some in the AG&apos;s office make it a practice of &apos;abusing&apos; the law on harrassment, etc, for their own benefit and, apparently, &apos;control&apos; needs.  I have to wonder if Ms. Parisien hasn&apos;t in fact used my particular case in order to herself take advantage of this weakness in our current judicial oversight ability.

 I can&apos;t say for sure, but absent a strong condemnation of these practices on the behalf of State employees in Downtown Seattle Superior Court this is definitely a way too risky candidate.

Curiously, the King County Bar Association only rates her as &apos;qualified&apos; - the third highest ranking in the race for position #1.  The gay bar group ranks her as unqualified.   I&apos;m not up on current legal practice in Seattle, but I do hope that this represents a knowledge of the abuses of Gregoire and her associates as it applies to the practice.  Certainly there are at least a few folks who are more than fed up with it - some of them are likely even friends of Sims!

The damage done by Gregoire and her cohorts to all aspects of authority in this State - public and private sector has yet to be determined.  This is why I oppose Gregoire.  That&apos;s not saying I have any legal evidence against her, it&apos;s just saying she&apos;s just too risky to hire.  There are areas that do need further professional investigation - on probable cause, if you will.  Most notable of those are her other &apos;professional&apos; associates.

Though the King County Court&apos;s may well believe that any individual capable of making a rational, legal, argument against the behavior of a State Employee (on OR off the clock) is in fact the equivalent of a violent lawless sexual predator it may well be that it is the opposit which is the case.

I&apos;m still open minded about Parisien, but absent her condemnation of these practices, including as they&apos;ve been applied to myself, she is, at best, not fit for this office.  I won&apos;t burden you with an articulation of the worst case...at least not yet.

Here&apos;s the email exchange, again, from the 2004 Gregoire Campaign:


      &gt; -----Original Message-----
&gt; From: Suzanne Parisien [mailto:suzanne@gregoire2004.com]
&gt; Sent: None
&gt; To: &apos;D.L. Tooley&apos;
&gt; Subject: RE: Christine Gregoire
&gt; 
&gt; Douglas, thanks for forwarding this to us.  We really appreciate
&gt; hearing from folks like yourself.  Thank you too for keeping informed
&gt; of the issues and keeping an open mind about the candidates.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Suzanne Parisien
&gt; 
&gt; Gregoire for Governor
&gt; 
&gt; 206-328-2969
&gt; 
&gt;   _____
&gt; 
&gt; From: D.L. Tooley [mailto:dltooley@net-venture.com]
&gt; Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:18 PM
&gt; To: info@gregoire2004.com; info@talmadge2004.org
&gt; Subject: FW: Christine Gregoire
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; -----Original Message-----
&gt; From: D.L. Tooley [mailto:dltooley@net-venture.com]
&gt; Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:10 PM
&gt; To: ron@ronsims.com
&gt; Cc: upfront@king5.com; ron.sims@metrokc.gov; info@talmadge2004.org;
&gt; billvirgin@seattlepi.com; Dave Ross; Jamieson; McCaslin, Sen. Bob;
&gt; dmonson@entercom.com;   info@gregoire2004.com
&gt; Subject: Christine Gregoire
&gt; 
&gt; Mr. Sims-
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; As you might imagine I am quite sympathetic to your political efforts
&gt; shining the light on Gregoire&apos;s handling of male sexual abuse cases and
&gt; related items regarding her professional competence and integrity.
&gt; However I must also question your motives - at a political level are
&gt; you in fact engaging the same questionable strategy as Gregoire
&gt; herself?
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Part of Gregoire&apos;s political strategy naturally appeals to women - but
&gt; in dealing with women&apos;s rights she has associated with others that have
&gt; used their position to renew the cycle of sexual abuse - in government
&gt; and in the profession of law.  This is politics by hatemongering and is
&gt; as disgusting as Mark Sidran using the streets of Downtown Seattle as
&gt; his personal Auschwitz.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; But are you yourself not doing exactly that, just now jumping ahead on
&gt; the cycle of abuse?  Certainly you yourself have campaigned to women
&gt; before, as well as to racial issues - another area subject to the same
&gt; problems of abuse.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Although you have my respect as a fair black leader I do have to wonder
&gt; if you have, like Gregoire, regularly associated with minority leaders
&gt; who have also renewed the cycle of racial abuse?
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; Gregoire as governor is terrifying, but are you really any better?  We
&gt; need leadership that stops the cycle of abuse - not that attempts to
&gt; manipulate it and encourage it to their own benefit - frankly that kind
&gt; of deceipt makes 90&apos;s corporate fraud look like a five year old
&gt; pocketing candy at the drug store.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; If you want to lead you must hold EVERYONE accountable for their
&gt; actions - including your own lawyers and those of your own race - like,
&gt; for instance, Norm Maleng, democrats in his office, and Norm Rice.
&gt; Finding new scapegoats and renewing the cycle of abuse is criminal and
&gt; unconstitutional and should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; I wonder if anyone in your generation is capable of doing that?  For
&gt; that matter has anyone in your generation really earned their success?
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; -Douglas Tooley

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Veep Peep</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/veep_peep.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.139</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T23:56:32Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-05T15:12:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Tom Brokaw has recently been suggesting Al Gore as VP and energy Czar - to both Gore and Obama. That is an interesting prospect, and, for me, I couldn&apos;t think of a more persuavive, and credible, addition to his pitch....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      Tom Brokaw has recently been suggesting Al Gore as VP and energy Czar - to both Gore and Obama.  That is an interesting prospect, and, for me, I couldn&apos;t think of a more persuavive, and credible, addition to his pitch.   

Value wise I&apos;m definitely more in line with Obama, but there is nothing worse than the inability to deliver on such promises, most likely creating the reverse.  McCain is a military guy, and although a good one, the upper ranks of the DC military establishment definitely need a wipping.  Bringing him in to cover up the mess could also lead to as negative a result as a failed Obama presidency.

Joseph Lieberman has been talked about as a Lieutenant for McCain.  This is interesting, but I don&apos;t think realistic.  More likely McCain will promote a younger member from his own party.  I&apos;m not capable of guessing who might be on the short list, but if he can select a member of the GOP that can credibly continue McCain&apos;s legacy than that too would be a very powerful team.

If McCain can find a Republican woman in her 40&apos;s or early 50&apos;s who is also a credible maverick and a &apos;compassionate conservative&apos; that individual would likely be the first female president of the US... regardless of McCain&apos;s success or failure.
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Moral Center</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/the_moral_center.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.138</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T23:25:00Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-01T00:10:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Moral Center By David Callahan 2006 Callahan rose to notice in America with his early 2004 book &apos;Cheating Culture&apos; where he makes the case that America has been taken over by those who dishonestly make their living - on...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Everybody&apos;s Business - Public Corporate and Government - as appropriate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Law and Consequence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>The Moral Center</strong></u>

<em>By David Callahan</em>

<strong>2006</strong>

Callahan rose to notice in America with his early 2004 book 'Cheating Culture' where he makes the case that America has been taken over by those who dishonestly make their living - on the right and left.

'Moral Center' is his 2006 post election reflection on solutions for that problem.

I knew Callahan as an undergraduate (where Brock Adams was Trustee, in addition to his duties as US Secretary of Transportation).  Callahan was on the political track while I was a economist into divestiture and workplace democracy.  But we did have the chance to have several worthwhile conversations - my strongest memory is noticing that he was getting letters published in the New York Times on a regular basis.  Definitely someone worth talking with, and hopefully I for him.

I'll leave his solutions to you, but let me extract his quoting of FDR for your thought.

<blockquote>Roosevelt was masterful at laying claim to the ideals of self-creation and personal liberty through hard work.  In his 1936 speech to the Democratic Convention, Roosevelt decried industrial barons who had imposed a "new despotism", and said that "the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man."  He exhorted America to fight a "new industrial dictatorship" that crushed "individual initiative".  FDR than spelled out his vision of freedom:  "Liberty requires opportunity to make a living - a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives a man not only enough to live by, but something to live for .....Today we stand committed to the proposition that freedom is no half-and-half affair.  If the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the marketplace."</blockquote>

Just prior to the conclusion of the book he quotes from another early 20th century leader, Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.  

<blockquote>We can have concentrated wealth in the hands of the few or we can have Democracy.  We cannot have both.</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Cops, Crooks, and Politicians</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/08/cops_crooks_and_politicians.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.137</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T23:00:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-31T23:23:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Cops, Crooks, and Politicians By Neil W. Moloney With a foreword by Former Governor John Spellman 1993 This book is not quite the tell all that the title promises, however for those concerned with public safety, post WW2 corruption, or...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Around the Sound - Metropolitan Puget Sound Regional Issues" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Books" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Everybody&apos;s Business - Public Corporate and Government - as appropriate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Fool For A Client" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Law and Consequence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>Cops, Crooks, and Politicians</strong></u>

<em>By Neil W. Moloney

With a foreword by Former Governor John Spellman</em>
<strong>
1993</strong>

This book is not quite the tell all that the title promises, however for those concerned with public safety, post WW2 corruption, or Pacific NW history this is a must read.

This is a cop's story of an uncompleted investigation, starting with a 1954 murder of a Seattle Police Officer in a Greenwood neighborhood bank robbery.  The perpetrators were Canadians, apparently connected.

The author, former chief of the Seattle PD, Port of Seattle, and the Washington State Patrol, started his career about this time.  He rose to the top ranks in the 1974 corruption scandals, a story he also addresses.

He doesn't name American names, or at least new ones.  He does talk at great length about Canadian corruption and implies that there are similarities in 'practice' on this side of the border.

One name he mentions a lot, and seems to like, is former US Attorney Brock Adams who did his best to prosecute the case.  Curiously this book was written not long after Adam's disgracement on no evidence.

Reading between the lines the names not said would be Norm Maleng and the Judges of King County, to start.  Moloney though is a good cop, and states only those conclusions that he can back up.

It is up to the reader to bring their own experience to the story - and to ask themselves whether those same corrupt practices continue - or, as more likely, reinvent themselves.



]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>El Topo</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/07/el_topo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.136</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T22:43:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-31T23:00:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>El Topo (The Mole) Written, Directed, and Starring Alejandro Jodorowsky 1970 (re-released on DVD 2007) European art films can suffer from dense cinematic symbolism - and this movie certainly has much of this strangeness It also definitely works. Stylistically it...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>El Topo</strong></u>
(The Mole)

<em>Written, Directed, and Starring Alejandro Jodorowsky</em>
<strong>
1970</strong>
(re-released on DVD 2007)

European art films can suffer from dense cinematic symbolism - and this movie certainly has much of this strangeness It also definitely works.  Stylistically it is a spaghetti western but it is much more of an allegory than any other contribution to that genre.

The start of the movie left me perplexed.  I think my interpretation may help to make sense of the movie, so a bit of a spoiler, which may or may not be true.  

After Jodorowsky's wife is killed by a rampaging gang of thugs he is left only with his naked son, his horse and guns, and a picture of his beloved.

Though the movie starts with his pursuit of the killers but is really about the many challenges he and his son face in the decades following.

In company of the recent 'Dark Knight' release 'The Mole' sits very well.  Being a hero is not so simple as it seems, and it will change your life of your entire family forever.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>American Psycho</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/07/american_psycho.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.135</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T22:30:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-31T22:40:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>American Psycho Based on a novel by Bret Easton Ellis Starring Christian Bale Directed by Mary Harron With Reese Witherspoon, Wilem Dafoe, Chloe Sevigny, Justin Theroux and Jared Leto 2000 Bret Easton Ellis&apos;s 1990 novel is a wickedly delicious account...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>American Psycho</strong></u>

<em>Based on a novel by Bret Easton Ellis

Starring Christian Bale

Directed by Mary Harron

With Reese Witherspoon, Wilem Dafoe, Chloe Sevigny, Justin Theroux and  Jared Leto</em>

<strong>2000</strong>

Bret Easton Ellis's 1990 novel is a wickedly delicious account of 1980's yuppie culture..  It is quite graphic and definitely deserves it's 'R' rating - and a rating to take literally.  Enough said.

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>El Espinazo Del Diablo</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/07/el_espinazo_del_diablo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.134</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-31T22:23:13Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-31T22:29:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>El Espinazo Del Diablo (The Devil&apos;s Backbone) Written and Directed by Guillermo Del Toro 2001 Like M. Knight Shymalan Del Toro has the ability to capture the light of humanity in well crafted horror. This movie is darker than Shymalan....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Classic Flicks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      <![CDATA[<u><strong>El Espinazo Del Diablo</strong></u>
(The Devil's Backbone)

<em>Written and Directed by Guillermo Del Toro</em>

<strong>2001</strong>

Like M. Knight Shymalan Del Toro has the ability to capture the light of humanity in well crafted horror.  This movie is darker than Shymalan.  Like the more recent 'Faun's Labryinth' the period is the Spainish civil war, one of the most interesting chapters of the 20th century.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Last words on Hillary, 2008</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/2008/07/last_words_on_hillary_2008.html" />
   <id>tag:www.motleytools.com,2008:/blog//1.133</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-11T21:44:49Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-11T22:49:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I have to admit that although I was a supporter of Hillary I&apos;m in fact encouraged by the fact that some of her supporters have gotten at least a small bit of comeuppance. Hillary herself will certainly go on, and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Orbital Spins" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motleytools.com/blog/">
      I have to admit that although I was a supporter of Hillary I&apos;m in fact encouraged by the fact that some of her supporters have gotten at least a small bit of comeuppance.  Hillary herself will certainly go on, and hopefully the power structures of this Country will learn the appropriate lesson.  Hopefully.

Both my sister-in-law and ma are big Obama supporters.  That positited the rhetorical question in my mind of comparing the &apos;stereotypical&apos; female Obama supporter in contrast with the typical female &apos;50 year old white woman&apos; Hilary supporter.  Upon reflection the question, though interesting, is mute.  The important thing is to treat each individual on their own merits, and that&apos;s a rule that&apos;s a part of every commandment Moses scribed in stone millenia ago.

However there is another question, not asked by the mainstream corporate media that may be very relevant.

Perhaps it is not gender that was the reason for Hilary&apos;s loss, but her generation?  Are people sick and tired of the boomers and their &apos;group think&apos; ethos which ignores individual responsibility and encourages the sort of negative behavior exhibited, at times, by the stereotypical &apos;50 year old spoiled white woman&apos;?

As such the question of the day:  Will the boomer generation ever put forth another finalist in the race for president, in either party?
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
